7 Comments
User's avatar
Jeff Chestnut's avatar

I have always considered the so called climate scientists as non practiced science and a social study but absolutely not science.

Judith Curry has it right.

Expand full comment
Peter Taggart's avatar

No mention of the point made by proffessor Murry Salby that CO2 is not the main green house gas, and its current volume, plus over lap with H2O absorbtion spectra means that we are at saturation point, and more CO2 cannot make significant additional changes to the greenhouse effect.

Expand full comment
michael janket's avatar

Splendid discussion! Lays it all on the line. My neighbor works for a company that puts in large commercial acreages of solar panels. According to Curry, this amounts to a boondoggle. But, the boondoggle is being financed in such manner that encourages more participation in these huge developments. Follow the money, who's ultimately paying for this slight of hand?

Expand full comment
Andrew Bamji's avatar

Let's wait for the next major volcanic eruption and see how much the global temperature drops. Here in the UK the temperature data comes from weather stations that have an accuracy of 2-5 degrees C (some with electronic thermometers that can register spikes of a few seconds, and are inappropriately sited at the end of airport runways) and yet the climate "scientists" obsess about possible changes of 0.1 degrees. Meanwhile the CO2 rises to less than historically recorded levels result in global greening.

How long will it take for the global warming crisis to be debunked in the MSM?

Expand full comment
North's avatar

I’m looking forward to seeing it crash too.

There’s more temperature variability in a single day than what they’re screeching about.

Expand full comment