Renowned climatologist Dr. Judith Curry debunks the myth of a climate consensus, revealing deep scientific disagreement on critical issues like the causes and impacts of warming.
No mention of the point made by proffessor Murry Salby that CO2 is not the main green house gas, and its current volume, plus over lap with H2O absorbtion spectra means that we are at saturation point, and more CO2 cannot make significant additional changes to the greenhouse effect.
Let's wait for the next major volcanic eruption and see how much the global temperature drops. Here in the UK the temperature data comes from weather stations that have an accuracy of 2-5 degrees C (some with electronic thermometers that can register spikes of a few seconds, and are inappropriately sited at the end of airport runways) and yet the climate "scientists" obsess about possible changes of 0.1 degrees. Meanwhile the CO2 rises to less than historically recorded levels result in global greening.
How long will it take for the global warming crisis to be debunked in the MSM?
Already started to be debunked everywhere with exception to Maurice Strong's protege Mark Carney - but then we can truly see in him the financial roll of the carbon credit system replacing the fiat/petro dollar.
Just like the demise of the Green Backs in the 1970's
Splendid discussion! Lays it all on the line. My neighbor works for a company that puts in large commercial acreages of solar panels. According to Curry, this amounts to a boondoggle. But, the boondoggle is being financed in such manner that encourages more participation in these huge developments. Follow the money, who's ultimately paying for this slight of hand?
Well there are periods of time when it was much higher, following temperature rises not as the narrative states today, and this created a spurt in growth of vegetation (similar to our current situation in the tropical regions)... man is more adaptable than one has come to believe I suppose, we would need to adapt over time more easily than a sudden shift.
I have always considered the so called climate scientists as non practiced science and a social study but absolutely not science.
Judith Curry has it right.
No mention of the point made by proffessor Murry Salby that CO2 is not the main green house gas, and its current volume, plus over lap with H2O absorbtion spectra means that we are at saturation point, and more CO2 cannot make significant additional changes to the greenhouse effect.
Interesting. Where can I read about this?
https://notrickszone.com/2024/04/23/3-physicists-use-experimental-evidence-to-show-co2s-capacity-to-absorb-radiation-has-saturated/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
and a lecture by Murry Salby: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3q-M_uYkpT0
Let's wait for the next major volcanic eruption and see how much the global temperature drops. Here in the UK the temperature data comes from weather stations that have an accuracy of 2-5 degrees C (some with electronic thermometers that can register spikes of a few seconds, and are inappropriately sited at the end of airport runways) and yet the climate "scientists" obsess about possible changes of 0.1 degrees. Meanwhile the CO2 rises to less than historically recorded levels result in global greening.
How long will it take for the global warming crisis to be debunked in the MSM?
Already started to be debunked everywhere with exception to Maurice Strong's protege Mark Carney - but then we can truly see in him the financial roll of the carbon credit system replacing the fiat/petro dollar.
Just like the demise of the Green Backs in the 1970's
This is geopoliticoclimatologicalBS
I’m looking forward to seeing it crash too.
There’s more temperature variability in a single day than what they’re screeching about.
Temp variability is the norm, how they've managed to create this 1 degree crisis narrative shows how dumbed down the populace is.
Splendid discussion! Lays it all on the line. My neighbor works for a company that puts in large commercial acreages of solar panels. According to Curry, this amounts to a boondoggle. But, the boondoggle is being financed in such manner that encourages more participation in these huge developments. Follow the money, who's ultimately paying for this slight of hand?
Probably because the funding disappeared under President Trump.
Climate Change was made up in order to make leaders green in their bank accounts.
Psalm 47:9
The shields of Earth belong to God.
That carbon they are sucking out of the atmosphere is a shield of God.
In the 75 years I’ve been on earth it’s this generation that believes that they know more than God.
It’s 84 degrees here right now and it’s not getting cooler.
David Keith head engineer behind Carbon Sequestration industries around my region of BC at least is in no other words the devil hisself.
https://davidkeith.earth/
https://carbonengineering.com/
God did give mankind the calculation to add or remove carbon. You don’t how it will effect mankind.
Well there are periods of time when it was much higher, following temperature rises not as the narrative states today, and this created a spurt in growth of vegetation (similar to our current situation in the tropical regions)... man is more adaptable than one has come to believe I suppose, we would need to adapt over time more easily than a sudden shift.
I was one of those old green peace types until Greta started crying all over everyone. Even by then, I think it was cooked.