Professor Ross McKitrick says there may be both financial and political incentives behind the interests that are driving the talk of a climate catastrophe.
I think it is most obvious that this scam (Prof. Happer) is as much a power as a money induced one.
One only has to look at the CVs of the German Greens in parliament. Those people wouldn't get burger flipping jobs, if this scam didn't exist.
But I also thingk this has now gone into overdrive money and subsidy-wise, as more and more people have embraced MMT: it doesn't matter what the state wastes the money upon, as long as it just does it, and as it will always increase phony-calculated GDP.
They have a point, if one looks at all the useless military spending over decades, which they originally wanted to see reduced to fund the climate scam, though nowadays, they just want to spend huge on both.
The climate change industry is very lucrative and those inside it, profiting from it, will pump out reports saying it's a crisis so that the money power and influence keeps flowing to them.
It is impossible for CO2 to cause any warming because CO2 is incapable of spontaneously producing heat. There are only two ways known to man (but not Michael Mann) which can increase the temperature of a system. The first is by adding thermal energy and there are various ways of doing that. The second is by doing work on the system. An obvious example is pumping up a bicycle tyre. The pump gets warm as a result of the work needed to compress the air. This is why the temperature of Venus is very high. It has a massive atmosphere and it is the compression of the atmosphere that causes the high surface temperature and it has nothing to do with the atmosphere being mainly CO2.
Easy to follow and common sense article.
Another great piece by you.
I think it is most obvious that this scam (Prof. Happer) is as much a power as a money induced one.
One only has to look at the CVs of the German Greens in parliament. Those people wouldn't get burger flipping jobs, if this scam didn't exist.
But I also thingk this has now gone into overdrive money and subsidy-wise, as more and more people have embraced MMT: it doesn't matter what the state wastes the money upon, as long as it just does it, and as it will always increase phony-calculated GDP.
They have a point, if one looks at all the useless military spending over decades, which they originally wanted to see reduced to fund the climate scam, though nowadays, they just want to spend huge on both.
The climate change industry is very lucrative and those inside it, profiting from it, will pump out reports saying it's a crisis so that the money power and influence keeps flowing to them.
Good info.
It is impossible for CO2 to cause any warming because CO2 is incapable of spontaneously producing heat. There are only two ways known to man (but not Michael Mann) which can increase the temperature of a system. The first is by adding thermal energy and there are various ways of doing that. The second is by doing work on the system. An obvious example is pumping up a bicycle tyre. The pump gets warm as a result of the work needed to compress the air. This is why the temperature of Venus is very high. It has a massive atmosphere and it is the compression of the atmosphere that causes the high surface temperature and it has nothing to do with the atmosphere being mainly CO2.