The fight against money laundering is just a pretext for creating a means to confiscate (or tax) assets if citizens become too critical/rebellious (see the Canadian Freedom Convoy). The fight against money laundering has been going on for decades and very little has been discovered under the constantly tightening rules that Brussels has promulgated, even taking into account the Panama Papers, so AML is the flimsiest of all possible pretexts. What it will amount to is one big UWO (unexplained wealth order) where the authorities will be able through the Asset Registry to find discrepancies between someone's declared income and their pool of assets, thereby creating grounds for an investigation into the origins of their wealth. Think of an unemployed 19 year old driving his own Rolls Royce. And what if the registry is hacked by criminals (almost inevitable); they will know exactly where to find someone's watch collection, priceless yacht etc. The big crime groups will have a field day and so will the totalitarian EU types.
"The Commission claims that there are no plans to create a register."
Corollary: Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.
The European Union is giving North Korea a real race to determine the most corrupt government in the world. Not just today's world; the entire history of the world.
It's all about removing FREEDOM, Control and Domination, culminating in SLAVERY!
The evolution process of Coronavirus (Covid19) took a decade! Proving that the Wuhan leak (or deliberate release) could not have been plausible! Why are we not surprised?
Fauci's Designer viruses via the military DoD practice of 'Gain of Function' (aka creating Bio-weapons of mass destruction). The art of modifying viruses for maximum impact on humans. He must Hang!
Reason! To create a need for a 'Highly Profitable' (experimental and dangerous = mRNA) 'Cure'! Even if it doesn't work and can kill or Genetically Modify (de-humanise) recipients.
For even more excessive profits Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson, etc, demand ZERO LIABILITY for injuries and DEATHS caused by their POISONS! A ridiculous condition that Trump must remove.
Unjabbed Mick (UK) We'll all live a lot longer by avoiding medicines and injections created by the likes of Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, etc, Everything from the now CORRUPT Big Pharma!
The feasibility study reveals concerning aspects that go far beyond the Commission's public narrative of "fighting money laundering." Several critical points demand our attention:
1. The study's own admission that cash control measures are "unlikely to be feasible" exposes the fundamental flaw in the EU's approach - they're attempting to create expansive surveillance infrastructure while acknowledging they can't effectively track the very thing they claim to target.
2. The centralized registry option (Scenario 3) is particularly alarming. While presented as the most "cost-effective," it represents an unprecedented consolidation of private financial data at the EU level. The study itself acknowledges this would constitute "the most significant restriction on citizens' data protection and privacy."
3. Looking at the chronology is revealing: This initiative began with Russian asset tracking but rapidly expanded to encompass virtually all private property - from jewelry to in-game assets. This mission creep perfectly exemplifies how EU control mechanisms consistently expand beyond their original scope.
4. Most concerning is the study's casual dismissal of fundamental rights, suggesting privacy intrusions are justified by vague "economic interests." The fact that they're contemplating monitoring personal items like jewelry and art shows this is less about fighting crime and more about creating comprehensive citizen surveillance.
The real issue here isn't technical feasibility but democratic accountability. When the study mentions EUR 1.3 trillion in potential tax recovery, it conveniently ignores how much of this stems from the EU's own byzantine regulatory environment that drives legitimate business into complex structures.
Rather than creating an unprecedented surveillance apparatus, we should be advocating for simpler national tax systems and protecting citizens' fundamental right to financial privacy. The Commission's own difficulty in finding a legal basis for this registry speaks volumes about its compatibility with basic democratic principles.
Nothing to do with fighting tax evasion or crime. Everything to do with Agenda 21 and inventorising every asset on the planet, with a view to the parasitical sociopaths who run the world eventually getting their grubby little mitts on the lot.
The fight against money laundering is just a pretext for creating a means to confiscate (or tax) assets if citizens become too critical/rebellious (see the Canadian Freedom Convoy). The fight against money laundering has been going on for decades and very little has been discovered under the constantly tightening rules that Brussels has promulgated, even taking into account the Panama Papers, so AML is the flimsiest of all possible pretexts. What it will amount to is one big UWO (unexplained wealth order) where the authorities will be able through the Asset Registry to find discrepancies between someone's declared income and their pool of assets, thereby creating grounds for an investigation into the origins of their wealth. Think of an unemployed 19 year old driving his own Rolls Royce. And what if the registry is hacked by criminals (almost inevitable); they will know exactly where to find someone's watch collection, priceless yacht etc. The big crime groups will have a field day and so will the totalitarian EU types.
"The Commission claims that there are no plans to create a register."
Corollary: Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.
The European Union is giving North Korea a real race to determine the most corrupt government in the world. Not just today's world; the entire history of the world.
It's all about removing FREEDOM, Control and Domination, culminating in SLAVERY!
The evolution process of Coronavirus (Covid19) took a decade! Proving that the Wuhan leak (or deliberate release) could not have been plausible! Why are we not surprised?
Fauci's Designer viruses via the military DoD practice of 'Gain of Function' (aka creating Bio-weapons of mass destruction). The art of modifying viruses for maximum impact on humans. He must Hang!
Reason! To create a need for a 'Highly Profitable' (experimental and dangerous = mRNA) 'Cure'! Even if it doesn't work and can kill or Genetically Modify (de-humanise) recipients.
For even more excessive profits Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson and Johnson, etc, demand ZERO LIABILITY for injuries and DEATHS caused by their POISONS! A ridiculous condition that Trump must remove.
Unjabbed Mick (UK) We'll all live a lot longer by avoiding medicines and injections created by the likes of Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, etc, Everything from the now CORRUPT Big Pharma!
The feasibility study reveals concerning aspects that go far beyond the Commission's public narrative of "fighting money laundering." Several critical points demand our attention:
1. The study's own admission that cash control measures are "unlikely to be feasible" exposes the fundamental flaw in the EU's approach - they're attempting to create expansive surveillance infrastructure while acknowledging they can't effectively track the very thing they claim to target.
2. The centralized registry option (Scenario 3) is particularly alarming. While presented as the most "cost-effective," it represents an unprecedented consolidation of private financial data at the EU level. The study itself acknowledges this would constitute "the most significant restriction on citizens' data protection and privacy."
3. Looking at the chronology is revealing: This initiative began with Russian asset tracking but rapidly expanded to encompass virtually all private property - from jewelry to in-game assets. This mission creep perfectly exemplifies how EU control mechanisms consistently expand beyond their original scope.
4. Most concerning is the study's casual dismissal of fundamental rights, suggesting privacy intrusions are justified by vague "economic interests." The fact that they're contemplating monitoring personal items like jewelry and art shows this is less about fighting crime and more about creating comprehensive citizen surveillance.
The real issue here isn't technical feasibility but democratic accountability. When the study mentions EUR 1.3 trillion in potential tax recovery, it conveniently ignores how much of this stems from the EU's own byzantine regulatory environment that drives legitimate business into complex structures.
Rather than creating an unprecedented surveillance apparatus, we should be advocating for simpler national tax systems and protecting citizens' fundamental right to financial privacy. The Commission's own difficulty in finding a legal basis for this registry speaks volumes about its compatibility with basic democratic principles.
Nothing to do with fighting tax evasion or crime. Everything to do with Agenda 21 and inventorising every asset on the planet, with a view to the parasitical sociopaths who run the world eventually getting their grubby little mitts on the lot.