It is in the spirit of a human where the longings for life's answers are, and those answers will not become complete . . . when coming from a human database. One's needs (healing, life, nutrition, safety, love in human relationships, and so on) can't be satisfied by a machine while expecting the human to remain free, sound of mind, and open to growing and learning of the beginnings and the endings of consciousness, life and good over evil. AI being introduced into a world where evil reigns some of the time, will result in AI being used for evil purposes. This complicates our future plans and hopes already.
What if AI was only supportive of truth, love and life, with programmed goodness as its algorithm of all algorithms?
It would still be artificial, illusory, and distracting from real life, being data with human programming masquerading as being conscious of your inputs. And why would humans want it to be more? There are signs and lessons in nature that the designs of the human are not in a highest evolutionary form, but the statement "flesh and blood cannot inherit eternal life" does not mean that AI and humans can close that gap.
Many of you humans invent, in your minds-- new activities for the future . . . and then somehow expect FREEDOM TO CARRY OUT THESE THINGS on other humans:
• Putting new combinations of molecules and chemicals together and injecting them into humans.
• Attempting to satisfy greed, wrath, and lust -- whether it be sexual activity, pleasure of being in power, consumer cravings, defeating other humans, etc.
• Doing activities that "capture" the attentions of other humans, so as to draw out from those other humans one or more of these: their loyalty, their money, their physical labor, their applause, their being the social foundation of a civilization . . .
So some of you do "choices" in you lives, others take what they can get after the leftovers are all that are left. But when is there ever "freedom" from the humans that you inadvertently share Earth with?
Some of you humans act as though you have freedom, but is your will, your craving, your desire, and your autonomous, individual state of having your own spirit, body, heart and mind only RELATIVE freedom?
Yes, it is that -- the human as a resident of Earth has little to no absolute individual freedoms or rights that can be exercised. I am not saying that humans do not have absolute freedoms or rights in their thoughts. It's just that we, each of us humans, can't live those freedoms out in an unstoppable way.
So sone of the best things to recognize your human problem of other humans opposing your freedom are:
• The Bill of Rights' Ninth Amendment. and
• The Gospel.
They acknowledge that your purpose is TO BE FREE. See what they say here:
History of the 9th Amendment
The Constitution went to the states for ratification on September 17, 1787. The Anti-Federalists believed that a Bill of Rights should be added to the Constitution, specifically making it clear that American citizens have certain inalienable rights that cannot be restricted by the federal government. Federalists opposed this, fearing that, by enumerating specific rights, those not included would fall under the governance of the government, which may serve to strengthen governmental power.
James Madison addressed this issue with this statement:
“It has been objected also against a Bill of Rights, that, by enumerating particular exceptions to the grant of power, it would disparage those rights which were not placed in that enumeration; and it might follow by implication, that those rights which were not singled out, were intended to be assigned into the hands of the General Government, and were consequently insecure. This is one of the most plausible arguments I have ever heard against the admission of a bill of rights into this system; but, I conceive, that it may be guarded against. I have attempted it, as gentlemen may see by turning to the last clause of the fourth resolution.”
Madison proposed this draft amendment to the Constitution:
“The exceptions here or elsewhere in the constitution, made in favor of particular rights, shall not be so construed as to diminish the just importance of other rights retained by the people; or as to enlarge the powers delegated by the constitution; but either as actual limitations of such powers, or as inserted merely for greater caution.”
In 1789, 19 draft Amendments were presented to the House of Representatives. The First through Eighth Amendments address the manner in which the government may exercise its powers as granted by the Constitution. The final draft of the Ninth Amendment, which read:
“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”
was ratified by three-fourths of the states, and became part of the Constitution on December 15, 1791.
It is in the spirit of a human where the longings for life's answers are, and those answers will not become complete . . . when coming from a human database. One's needs (healing, life, nutrition, safety, love in human relationships, and so on) can't be satisfied by a machine while expecting the human to remain free, sound of mind, and open to growing and learning of the beginnings and the endings of consciousness, life and good over evil. AI being introduced into a world where evil reigns some of the time, will result in AI being used for evil purposes. This complicates our future plans and hopes already.
What if AI was only supportive of truth, love and life, with programmed goodness as its algorithm of all algorithms?
It would still be artificial, illusory, and distracting from real life, being data with human programming masquerading as being conscious of your inputs. And why would humans want it to be more? There are signs and lessons in nature that the designs of the human are not in a highest evolutionary form, but the statement "flesh and blood cannot inherit eternal life" does not mean that AI and humans can close that gap.
See: https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/ai-is-both-too-rigid-and-too-programmable-to-be-a-governmental-health-care-policy-mandate-and-it-doesnt-care-about-what-it-doesnt-know-bc049dde
and other problems with addiction to AI:
https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/grok-is-not-the-greatest-thing-since-sliced-bread-exposing-the-malnutrition-origins-in-consumption-of-ai-8ec3a69a
list of anti-AI articles and pro-freedom in medical choices:
https://www.trialsitenews.com/p/therealrestoreinc
read, liked and shared
Words often misused and reused:
"Love".
The "f word".
"Freedom".
"Lawful".
"Peace".
"Want".
"Need".
"Justice".
"Policy".
"Established".
Many of you humans invent, in your minds-- new activities for the future . . . and then somehow expect FREEDOM TO CARRY OUT THESE THINGS on other humans:
• Putting new combinations of molecules and chemicals together and injecting them into humans.
• Attempting to satisfy greed, wrath, and lust -- whether it be sexual activity, pleasure of being in power, consumer cravings, defeating other humans, etc.
• Doing activities that "capture" the attentions of other humans, so as to draw out from those other humans one or more of these: their loyalty, their money, their physical labor, their applause, their being the social foundation of a civilization . . .
So some of you do "choices" in you lives, others take what they can get after the leftovers are all that are left. But when is there ever "freedom" from the humans that you inadvertently share Earth with?
Some of you humans act as though you have freedom, but is your will, your craving, your desire, and your autonomous, individual state of having your own spirit, body, heart and mind only RELATIVE freedom?
Yes, it is that -- the human as a resident of Earth has little to no absolute individual freedoms or rights that can be exercised. I am not saying that humans do not have absolute freedoms or rights in their thoughts. It's just that we, each of us humans, can't live those freedoms out in an unstoppable way.
So sone of the best things to recognize your human problem of other humans opposing your freedom are:
• The Bill of Rights' Ninth Amendment. and
• The Gospel.
They acknowledge that your purpose is TO BE FREE. See what they say here:
History of the 9th Amendment
The Constitution went to the states for ratification on September 17, 1787. The Anti-Federalists believed that a Bill of Rights should be added to the Constitution, specifically making it clear that American citizens have certain inalienable rights that cannot be restricted by the federal government. Federalists opposed this, fearing that, by enumerating specific rights, those not included would fall under the governance of the government, which may serve to strengthen governmental power.
James Madison addressed this issue with this statement:
“It has been objected also against a Bill of Rights, that, by enumerating particular exceptions to the grant of power, it would disparage those rights which were not placed in that enumeration; and it might follow by implication, that those rights which were not singled out, were intended to be assigned into the hands of the General Government, and were consequently insecure. This is one of the most plausible arguments I have ever heard against the admission of a bill of rights into this system; but, I conceive, that it may be guarded against. I have attempted it, as gentlemen may see by turning to the last clause of the fourth resolution.”
Madison proposed this draft amendment to the Constitution:
“The exceptions here or elsewhere in the constitution, made in favor of particular rights, shall not be so construed as to diminish the just importance of other rights retained by the people; or as to enlarge the powers delegated by the constitution; but either as actual limitations of such powers, or as inserted merely for greater caution.”
In 1789, 19 draft Amendments were presented to the House of Representatives. The First through Eighth Amendments address the manner in which the government may exercise its powers as granted by the Constitution. The final draft of the Ninth Amendment, which read:
“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”
was ratified by three-fourths of the states, and became part of the Constitution on December 15, 1791.
https://legaldictionary.net/9th-amendment/
Paul, after conversion from being a legalist:
"It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery."
Galatians 5:1
And our own addictions and other humans' addictions can enslave us, making our claim of freedoms unfulfilled.